Expectancy, Reality, and Locus of Control in the Adoption of a Management Information System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v17i1.7642

Keywords:

Information Technology, Technology Acceptance Model, Resistance, Digital Limitations, Digital Effectiveness

Abstract

This teaching case describes the experience of a professional working as head of operations at the secretariat of a graduate school at a Brazilian federal university in dealing with group conflicts on the acceptance and adoption of information technologies (IT) in the workplace. The IT of interest here is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, its use routines and its users (the school’s faculty members). The theoretical framing involves acceptance, adoption, resistance and use of the system by the user group as well as aspects of use effectiveness. Therefore, the case offers opportunities to discuss research traditions institutionalized in the IT community since the 1980s by the technology acceptance model (TAM) and later integrated in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), along with insights from the newly developed stream of research on IT use effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 493-524, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148693

Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the AIS, 8(4), 212-218, http://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00126

Broos, A., & Roe, K. (2006). The digital divide in the Playstation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents. Poetics, 34, 306-317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.002

Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283-295, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438

Burton-Jones, A., & Grange, C. (2013). From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 632-658, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0444

Burton-Jones, A., Stein, M.-K., & Mishra, A. (2017). MISQ Research Curation on IS Use, https://www.misqresearchcurations.org/blog/2017/12/1/is-use

Chan, Y., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22, 297-315, https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000109

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211, https://doi.org/10.2307/249688

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340, https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719-734, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment & Decision Making, (1), 23-32, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000322

Gurstein, M. (2003). Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide. First Monday, 8, 12.

Karsten, R., Mitra, A., & Schmidt, D. (2012). Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational & End User Computing, 24(4), 54-80, https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2012100104

Koh, C. E., Prybutok, V. R., Ryan, S. D., & Wu, Y. (2010). A model for mandatory use of software technologies: An integrative approach by applying multiple levels of abstraction of informing science. Informing Science, 13, 177-203, https://doi.org/10.28945/1326

Leavitt, H. J. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In: March, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of organizations, Chicago, IL, Rand McNally, 1144-1170.

Macêdo, D. G., Gaete, L., & Joia, L. A. (2014). Antecedentes à resistência a sistemas empresariais: A perspectiva de gestores brasileiros. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(2), 139-160.

Mota, F. P. B., & Porto-Bellini, C. G. P. (2017). Peças e engrenagens do uso da Internet. Proceedings of the 23rd AMCIS. Boston, MA, August 10-12.

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398

Porto-Bellini, C. G. (2018). The ABCs of effectiveness in the digital society. Communications of the ACM, 61(7), 84-91, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3205945

Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489-493, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.489

Ruivo, P., Johansson, B., Sarker, S., & Oliveira, T. (2020). The relationship between ERP capabilities, use, and value. Computers in Industry, 117, 103209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103209

Shiose, S. F., dos Santos, L. M., da Silva, D. V., Araujo, J. B., & Calvosa, M. V. D. (2012). Sistemas integrados de gestão: Alternativa contemporânea eficaz de gerenciamento e planejamento para instituições públicas de ensino. Anais do SEMEAD – Seminários em Administração.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the AIS, 17(5), 328-376, https://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): Temática Livre

Section

Casos para Ensino

License

Estou ciente de que, em sendo aprovado, a publicação do artigo será no formato on-line na RGO.

Também tenho ciência de que há autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Do ponto de vista do Creative Commons, a Revista Gestão Organizacional é de acesso aberto e irrestrito, porém não permitindo adaptações nos artigos, nem o uso comercial.

Sobre a licença Creative Commons: As licenças e instrumentos de direito de autor e de direitos conexos da Creative Commons forjam um equilíbrio no seio do ambiente tradicional “todos os direitos reservados” criado pelas legislações de direito de autor e de direitos conexos. Os nossos instrumentos fornecem a todos, desde criadores individuais até grandes empresas, uma forma padronizada de atribuir autorizações de direito de autor e de direitos conexos aos seus trabalhos criativos. Em conjunto, estes instrumentos e os seus utilizadores formam um corpo vasto e em crescimento de bens comuns digitais, um repositório de conteúdos que podem ser copiados, distribuídos, editados, remixados e utilizados para criar outros trabalhos, sempre dentro dos limites da legislação de direito de autor e de direitos conexos.

A Revista Gestão Organizacional  adota o sistema: Atribuição-SemDerivações-SemDerivados CC BY-NC-ND: Permite o download dos seus trabalhos e o compartilhemento desde que atribuam crédito, mas sem que possam alterá-los de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-los para fins comerciais.